<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Landis Hearing Date Set</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rant-your-head-off.com/WordPress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rant-your-head-off.com/WordPress/?p=160</link>
	<description>Always select Genuine Rant™ Brand. Everything else is just words.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:27:08 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rant</title>
		<link>http://rant-your-head-off.com/WordPress/?p=160#comment-1173</link>
		<dc:creator>Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 20:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rant-your-head-off.com/WordPress/?p=160#comment-1173</guid>
		<description>ORG,

Got a link to the recording? 

- Rant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ORG,<br />
<br />
Got a link to the recording? <br />
<br />
- Rant]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ORG</title>
		<link>http://rant-your-head-off.com/WordPress/?p=160#comment-1172</link>
		<dc:creator>ORG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 19:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rant-your-head-off.com/WordPress/?p=160#comment-1172</guid>
		<description>Rant:

I just heard a recording of it.  It&#039;s on Bloomberg Financial.  If it&#039;s not on the net now, it will be soon.

A few things to add.

1) I heard no detail about the May 14 hearing.  No place or arbritators were not named.  You agree

2) Baker&#039;s slideshow was rehash of what he has done before.  The only new info MIGHT BE pages 24 to 27 citing the UCLA studies positivity criteria.  You agree this is new?

The new slide show
http://www.floydfairnessfund.org/resources/Wiki Denfense Slide.pdf


3) At the end Rafferty said that the vast majority of Floyd&#039;s legal fees have gone to discovery.  They want the longitundinal data.  He said they expect it to show as many errors, if not more, than the positive test and will clear Floyd.  This is why they are so focused on it.  Is this the impression you got?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[Rant:<br />
<br />
I just heard a recording of it.  It&#8217;s on Bloomberg Financial.  If it&#8217;s not on the net now, it will be soon.<br />
<br />
A few things to add.<br />
<br />
1) I heard no detail about the May 14 hearing.  No place or arbritators were not named.  You agree<br />
<br />
2) Baker&#8217;s slideshow was rehash of what he has done before.  The only new info MIGHT BE pages 24 to 27 citing the UCLA studies positivity criteria.  You agree this is new?<br />
<br />
The new slide show<br />
<a href="http://www.floydfairnessfund.org/resources/Wiki" rel="nofollow">http://www.floydfairnessfund.org/resources/Wiki</a> Denfense Slide.pdf<br />
<br />
<br />
3) At the end Rafferty said that the vast majority of Floyd&#8217;s legal fees have gone to discovery.  They want the longitundinal data.  He said they expect it to show as many errors, if not more, than the positive test and will clear Floyd.  This is why they are so focused on it.  Is this the impression you got?]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
