Sunday Short Takes

by Rant on August 12, 2007 · 8 comments

in Discovery Team, Floyd Landis, Lance Armstrong

Due to a looming deadline, I’m supposed to be working on my day job right now, but I’m taking a bit of a break …

If You Don’t Crash, You’re Not Trying Hard Enough

Back in the early 90s, I worked at Cycle Cellar, a bike shop in Ann Arbor, Michigan that catered to high-end roadies and mountain bikers, as well as weekend warriors and those who only occasionally would take their two-wheeled companions out for a spin. One of my coworkers, about 10 years younger than me, had a saying when it came to mountain biking, “If you don’t crash, you’re not trying hard enough.”

When it came to the Leadville 100 MTB Trail Marathon yesterday, Floyd Landis was trying hard enough. He took a spill on the first major descent, tearing his shorts and leaving blood and trail rash on him for the next 75 miles. Landis was riding with the leading group at the time, and he got up on his bike and made it back to them.

For the rest of the race, he was Dave Wiens’ shadow, more or less. Landis stuck with Wiens at the front, seriously challenging the 4-time winner of the event. As Wiens later told This Just In:

“That was the hardest and the best mountain bike race of my life,” said Wiens at the finish. “Mentally, physically, it was brutal. And having Floyd Landis behind you sucks.”

After three weeks of training at altitude, Landis was prepared. And anyone who races at that level knows, having Floyd Landis breathing down your neck is pretty intimidating. Obviously, knowing Landis was right there with him motivated the 42-year-old Wiens to go just a little bit harder. Here’s how he described exiting the descent from the brutal climb to the turnaround point:

“I just heard a roar behind me coming through the crowd at the Twin Lakes Aid Station,” said Wiens. “And I knew Floyd was right behind me.”

Landis would stay right behind him most of the way. At that point, the race was down to Wiens and the 2006 Tour de France winner. Mike Kloser, who finished third in his first attempt at the Leadville race, was already 5 minutes behind the two leaders.

“I can’t say I’m happy to finish third,” said Kloser, who came in over ten minutes behind Landis. “But those guys (Floyd and Dave) were flying up there. That is probably the best I have ever seen Dave ride.”

After the race was over, Landis sounded pretty satisfied with his result:

“Dave’s always been a better mountain biker than me anyway,” said Landis, who last raced against Wiens during his mountain biking days in 1997. “I felt good today, and the long distance helped me, but I’m honestly happy to finish second behind Dave.”

Landis also was quoted by the Summit Daily as saying:

“I’m not embarrassed at all to be beaten by [Dave Wiens]. He’s the real thing.”

As Kloser said of Landis after the race:

“He could’ve easily just pulled the plug but he rode tough,” said Vail’s Mike Kloser, another MTB Hall of Famer, who took third (7:10:24) in his first Leadville 100. “I think he wanted to make a statement that he’s still got the legs in him.”

It would have been a treat to see. Having spent time in that area over the years as well as other parts of Colorado not too far away, I well remember that the scenery around the Leadville course is as beautiful as any part of the Colorado Rockies. With some good training and a lot of determination, it sounds like Floyd’s back on the way to top fitness — if he isn’t already there.

The Disco Demise

Of all the things I’ve seen written about the Discovery Channel Team’s closing shop at the end of the season (their last race will be in Abu Dhabi in early November at The Race of Champions, from what I’ve seen), Lance Armstrong puts his finger on the problem facing professional cycling right now. In a conference-call Friday afternoon, Armstrong said:

“Perhaps there is someone out there to come in and solve the problems and own the sport – that might not be a bad thing for cycling.”

“The organisers, the governing bodies, the rider, the teams, the press, the fans – all of these things are at war, and we need some semblance of organisation,” Armstrong continued. “I don’t want to minimise doping, but take it out of the equation. All of the other stuff going on is troublesome for sure. I disagree with ASO in the sense that they don’t allow Pat McQuaid to come to the Tour de France. He runs the UCI – you have to have a certain level of respect for everyone in the game. That has been put on hold, but we have to get back a level of trust with all of the interested parties.”

Returning to doping specifically, Armstrong said that he is out of answers as to what more cycling can do. “No other professional sport can be compared to cycling when it comes to the efforts and strides that are being made… no other professional American or European sport, if you walked in as a commissioner and said you are going to use the rules that cycling uses, those athletes would never play another down, another inning or another match. I have to take my hats off to the UCI and to everyone who has tried to implement the controls. As we see now, the controls work.”

“What else can cycling do, is the question? I know there are critics like Mr. Pound and the list goes on, but outside of having someone live with Dick Pound, I don’t know what else anyone can do!”

Armstrong’s right, those who run the world of cycling need to come together, work things out, and perhaps (figuratively, at least) smoke a peace pipe. It’s great to see sponsors like T-Mobile and Milram sticking with the sport, but with all the in-fighting going on right now, the sport has a lot to work out in order to thrive in the future. Cycling will definitely survive in some manner or fashion, of that I have no doubt. Exactly how will be determined by whether all the warring parties can come together and work out their differences.

Morgan Hunter August 12, 2007 at 5:16 pm

Yeah Rant – there are some things worth repeating:

Floyd Landis-2006 Tour de France winner. Floyd Landis-2006 Tour de France winner. Floyd Landis-2006 Tour de France winner. Floyd Landis-2006 Tour de France winner. Floyd Landis-2006 Tour de France winner. Floyd Landis-2006 Tour de France winner.
Floyd Landis-2006 Tour de France winner. Floyd Landis-2006 Tour de France winner. Floyd Landis-2006 Tour de France winner. Floyd Landis-2006 Tour de France winner. Floyd Landis-2006 Tour de France winner. Floyd Landis-2006 Tour de France winner.

Strangely – I feel so much better now. Wait a minute, I think, yes, It’s coming back,
Floyd Landis-2006 Tour de France winner. Floyd Landis-2006 Tour de France winner. Floyd Landis-2006 Tour de France winner. Floyd Landis-2006 Tour de France winner. Floyd Landis-2006 Tour de France winner. Floyd Landis-2006 Tour de France winner.
Floyd Landis-2006 Tour de France winner. Floyd Landis-2006 Tour de France winner. Floyd Landis-2006 Tour de France winner. Floyd Landis-2006 Tour de France winner. Floyd Landis-2006 Tour de France winner. Floyd Landis-2006 Tour de France winner!

Morgan Hunter August 13, 2007 at 4:54 am

“Perhaps there is someone out there to come in and solve the problems and own the sport – that might not be a bad thing for cycling.” I don’t get this – Rant.

Does it mean that one person literally “owns” or has controlling interest in all the pro-races? If it does – I’m afraid that I would have to disagree. The Tour De France is a fantastic race that was shaped by all the French personalities that worked, I would think, very hard to keep it a living thing. People need competition, or one could say – “obstacles” to grow and be inventive…If one person were to own Cycling – would cycling not become more “formated” as in McDonald’s? I like that McDonald’s parent company “sets” the standards – that is nice – but it is rather plastic – don’t you think?

Maybe – Armstrong was just being “disillusioned” when he said that, perhaps he was feeling despair? I think that when such a situation as what is now going on keeps on for a long time – despair is the real enemy. When we exist in despair, we have lost contact with joy, all is rather blah and tasteless…it is a dangerous state for a human being or a group of people. We must always be on guard against it.

Or have I just completely misunderstood you and Lance…If you’re slacking off pal – get out from under those cozy covers and plant your butt on the bike and start feeling life flowing through you buddy. Don’t let the bastards wear you down…you hear – all of you out there…remember NETWORK: “I’ve had enough and I ain’t taking it anymore!”

WE HAVE A VOICE – more importantly – WE HAVE MINDS – no one and no thing, no situation, no institution should gain the power over you to DEFINE WHO YOU are. That includes you too Lance!

Or perhaps – we are just realizing how hard it must be for Floyd, eh? Floyd must feel this feeling too – and maybe for a whole lot longer then us. It has been happening to him directly, and the “reality” of this load comes thumping all over us a year after.

Get mad at all the bastards who are just leeches making a living off of the talents of good people.
Get mad at journalists who are so shallow that they propagate mistrust and partisanship to sell bloody cheap rags called “newspapers”!
Get mad at self righteous people who tell other people how to live but can’t do it themselves!
Get mad at bastards who would sacrifice anything or anybody – just to get what they want!

It is alright to be angry and frustrated because we have heard nothing from the “arbitrators” – we are frustrated and angry, because we know that it is NOT A FAIR SET UP!

And while I’m at it – IF LANCE is “totally bummed” by the hopelessness of this situation in Cycling – then I AM PISSED RIGHTEOUSLY AT HIM! Even though I have enjoyed his riding from 99 on! He is a super rider – he is a hero to millions – HE HAS A RESPONSIBILITY to carry that load. So I am pissed that my HERO, Lance Armstrong – all American boy – is being beaten down by this whole cycling situation.

The thing is – I don’t hate him – I am pissed at him – I am just mad as hell…but I am not hating him because he is only human, as we all are! Even heroes are human beings first – maybe he is unbeatable when he rides that bike – but I cannot expect the guy to be ALWAYS a hero – he’s just human…like the rest of us….And to finish off – I or the rest of us out here – cannot lose heart – because Lance may be feeling despair – Lance was not the reason I love biking – BIKING is the reason I love biking…and that my dear people is a real good thing to remember – when we are feeling despair…

Rant August 13, 2007 at 5:08 am

Morgan,

I can’t say I know the full context of Armstrong’s comment, but I believe that he’s referring to something like Formula 1 and Bernie Eccelstone.

I think he was just throwing an idea out there, saying, “We need to find a new way of doing things, a new way of organizing things, and a new way of working together to make the sport better. What we currently have isn’t working.”

I don’t know that he’s “totally bummed” or not. I think he’s making the point that all of the factions within cycling are at war with each other, and until they make peace, it’s going to be hard for teams seeking new sponsors to offer the guarantees that a major sponsor new to the sport would want to hear.

However cycling is organized in the future, the interested parties need to come together and work together to ensure its viability. That includes the teams, the governing bodies, the race organizers, the cyclists, the fans, anyone who has an interest in making the sport succeed.

With all the acrimony right now, things don’t look so good. But if all the groups who have an interest in cycling’s success can get past all the “stuff” then maybe it will still have a bright future. Maybe Tailwind Sports will reconsider and get back into the fray. We can only hope.

– Rant

just bitch slap me please August 13, 2007 at 5:52 am

Rant,
One thing I did not understand about Tailwind backing out of the sport was the reason(s) why: what were they?
They have been looking for a title sponsor since Disco said no mas, turning from the US to Europe to China of all places. Clearly the pickings were thin.
But then, in quitting the biz, Armstrong said it was NOT about the inability of finding such a sponsor, he already had one 90% committed and could have sealed the deal.
So what gives? Did they really fold when they finally had the money, or was the lack of the sponsor the real deal, and Armstrong is just lying about it?
The whole thing reminded me of the doping cyclist denying, denying, denying until he gets definitely caught, and then fesses up. What was the point of Lance denying the obvious: they could not find someone with deep pockets? Who did he think he was fooling?

Will August 13, 2007 at 6:31 am

I think we need to start with a blank page. We need to look at other models such as auto racing, tennis, football (both US and otherwise), basketball, and other sports. How do they do things and how are they successful?

I’d like Rant to visualize and write about what cycling might be under each of these other models.

Imagine if a world professional cycling entity was sponsored by cycling companies (like many other sports) as well as television. This version of professional cycling might have a commissioner who looks after the health of the sport (business.) This version might encourage the athletes to form a union to look after their own interests. This version might approach countries around the world to set up races year round. This version might even have a rider draft each year to help equalize the teams. This version might handle their doping problems from within the organization like so many other sports do.

It might take Lance to overcome the current overlapping and competing structure. Lance as the first commissioner?

Morgan Hunter August 13, 2007 at 7:07 am

Hey Will, I’m all for the riders forming a union – but I am a bit doubtful that American football, European football, or Basketball or Ice hockey, is any “cleaner” than cycling.

I think it is a good idea to get rid of the present bodies who are supposed to do the work of looking after the interests of the riders, the sport. But do you think that other sports have a better system then cycling?

It seems to me that the only thing that pro-football, basketball and ice hockey have is that their are able to blanket their doping problems better then cycling. Each has a much tighter control of everyone involved, so Bonds can juice, the media may be pushing to get him, but the USDA has actually little power to muscle in like they have in cycling…

There is also another issue – the present bodies who own the big tours. It is their baby. Isn’t some of the problems that cycling is facing today – due to several present governing bodies trying to muscle in on these owners? If one looks at the Tour, it is a “product” that is put together by the owners. The owners have the right to “sell” their product for the most money they can get, no?

Rant August 13, 2007 at 5:37 pm

jbsmp,

Bit of a mystery as to why the really called it a day, isn’t it? What do you bet that this was the “other business obligation” that Armstrong had to deal with, precluding his ride at Leadville? Lance probably would have been swarmed with people demanding to know “Why?” if he’d shown up.

Will and Morgan,

Good idea to chew over (from either point of view): How to reorganized the sport and with what business model. That’s an idea that I’m going to keep in mind and come back to in the near future.

– Rant

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: