Ramblin’ On My Mind

by Rant on February 12, 2008 · 21 comments

in Doping in Sports

Lots of things going on the last few days. A couple of articles in the New York Times struck a chord for me.

What, Me Paranoid?

First is the article that appeared in Saturday’s paper with the headline Wary U.S. Olympians Will Bring Food to China. The article caught my eye for more than one reason. First, the smart-ass in me wondered, “What, is the food there so bad that we now have to bring our own? Or can’t the Chinese government actually provide enough food for the athletes?”

But, of course, the story leads off with an anecdote about an American caterer, hired to provide food for US Olympians in Beijing, who ran across a half a chicken breast that was 14 inches long, with enough meat on it to feed a family of eight. That’s some gigantic chicken they grow on the other side of the Pacific. Is he sure it wasn’t a turkey breast? (Just another wise-ass comment, that’s not a serious question.)

Where it gets really interesting is the second paragraph, which quotes Frank Puleo, the caterer, as saying:

“We had it tested and it was so full of steroids that we never could have given it to athletes. They all would have tested positive.”

That’s the real reason right there. The story raises several questions, some related to doping, and some not. Perhaps the most important point (in my mind) is that the meats that we consume are so laden with drugs of various sorts. If I encountered a chicken breast in the supermarket as large as the story describes, I’d be a bit suspicious about it. Growth hormones, steroids, probably a few antibiotics thrown in for good measure.

Even if the drugs don’t exactly enhance the chicken’s performance, they appear to have enhanced the animal’s size.

Now, when it comes to the whole subject of doping in sports, a story like this shows just how careful — dare I say “paranoid” — one has to be during competition. Just how juiced was that bird? Hormones, steroids, and many other things are given to the animals that we consume on a regular basis. And, with certain test methods, those hormones and steroids and so forth can be detected.

With the concept of strict liability, of course, it doesn’t matter how a banned substance got in you, just that it’s there. But, if it could be there just from consuming a chicken breast, or piece of meat, should a person be punished? Granted, without the strict liability doctrine, athletes might argue that it was the food they ate that caused their positive tests. And perhaps one or two of them would be right.

And, because these tests can’t always determine where a banned substance actually came from, it’s not always possible to say definitively exactly how a banned substance showed up. Except to say that clearly, the accused must have been doping.

Maybe it’s time to take another look at the whole strict liability doctrine. Or, maybe some changes need to be made about what constitutes a positive doping test. Like, for instance, establishing some thresholds for certain substances, so that an athlete who’s consumed “juiced” meat products wouldn’t be charged with doping. Just a thought.

Of course, if the animals weren’t juiced that would be good, too. Not just for the athletes, but for all of us. And it makes me wonder if maybe, just maybe, has someone ever been charged with a doping violation for eating contaminated chicken or beef? Far-fetched, I know, but truth has a way of being stranger than fiction.

A New Way To Beat Muscle Fatigue?

Today’s New York Times has another article, which addresses the problem of muscle fatigue. If someone could devise a pill that can prevent muscle fatigue, or at least delay its onset, that has serious implications for sports of all sorts. Endurance athletes might benefit from such drugs, and so could sprinters, weightlifters, and many others.

According to the article, the old idea that lactic acid buildup was the cause of muscle fatigue has been disproved. A new theory suggests that calcium channel leaks in muscle fibers are what cause fatigue. As Gina Kolata reports:

Ordinarily, ebbs and flows of calcium in cells control muscle contractions. But when muscles grow tired, the investigators report, tiny channels in them start leaking calcium, and that weakens contractions. At the same time, the leaked calcium stimulates an enzyme that eats into muscle fibers, contributing to the muscle exhaustion.

The original research was done on mice, but an interesting bit of research has been done on some human subjects, too.

Highly trained bicyclists rode stationary bikes at intense levels of exertion for three hours a day three days in a row. For comparison, other cyclists sat in the room but did not exercise.

Dr. Nieman removed snips of thigh muscle from all the athletes after the third day and sent them to Columbia, where Dr. Marks’s group analyzed them without knowing which samples were from the exercisers and which were not.The results, Dr. Marks said, were clear. The calcium channels in the exercisers leaked. A few days later, the channels had repaired themselves. The athletes were back to normal.

And, of course, the idea that athletes might be interested in using a drug to stave off muscle fatigue comes up, too. As the article concludes, we find this quote:

Yet, Dr. [Steven] Liggett [a researcher at the University of Maryland] said, for athletes “we have to ask whether it would be prudent to be circumventing this mechanism.”

“Maybe this is a protective mechanism,” he said. “Maybe fatigue is saying that you are getting ready to go into a danger zone. So it is cutting you off. If you could will yourself to run as fast and as long as you could, some people would run until they keeled over and died.”

Unfortunately, there are those who are so driven to glory that they would try such a drug, despite the dangers. And, as we’ve seen over the years, some enterprising chemists have found ways of manufacturing drugs and selling them, even though the drugs have not been approved for sale.

Gene doping has long been heralded as the next big thing in doping. While that’s certainly possible, I have a hunch that something much simpler will come along in the meantime. Like, say, finding a way to stave off or even prevent muscle fatigue.

Morgan Hunter February 13, 2008 at 12:36 am

The World in Headlines.

Animal Rights Activist Pumped Up — 14-Kilo Chicken in the Lead! Turkey’s Up in Arms!

Grass Roots Movement in China — Eighty Pound Cauliflower suspect! “Vegans of the World On Hunger Strike!

WADA Holds Emergency Meeting — Considers Automatic Ban on All Olympic Athletes! China Claims Prejudice Against Eating with Chop-Sticks!

Rumors Abound — LNDD — has Tripled its Part-Time Staffing! Disclaiming Rumors that It has become the “Official WADA” Testing Lab for China!

Nebraska and New Jersey – In the Spirit of Competition Produce Twin Pairs of Chicken Breasts — Able to feed a Family of 14 — No Problem!

The UN is Considering Special FEED-Packs for ALL Olympic athletes! US — Protests Unfair Advantage!

Revealing Photo — Dick Pound Gnawing Extra Large Drum Stick, While Visiting China! USADA — Filed Written Protest!

Scientific Proof — Eat and Purge does not Work for Olympic Athletes! McDonald’s Cancels 5 Pound double Whopper!

Drug Manufacturers Deny Working on Anti-Fatigue Drug! Endurance Athletes Have No Comment!

WADA Quoted — “Why Can’t we all just get along?”

Morgan Hunter February 13, 2008 at 7:41 am

Rant,

So I’m wondering – what the IOC will do with all those “poorer” countries that can’t fly their own food over to China? Maybe they’ll only test the richer countries who can? Everybody else gets a TUV?

All I can say is: “Well Ollie – you got us into another fine mess!”

Rant February 13, 2008 at 8:08 am

Morgan,
You ask an excellent question. What will happen to those who can’t afford to bring their own food? Dog only knows…

Morgan Hunter February 13, 2008 at 9:23 am

Not to worry Rant –

You know how far thinking and efficient the IOC is….really, I mean that.

I can’t wait for this Olympics – Complete “Olypmic breakdown” due to “MOO-GOO-GAI-PAN!”

William Schart February 13, 2008 at 9:46 am

And how many athletes are going to absolutely stuff themselves with Chinese chicken, thereby hoping to get an advanatage? Will WADA or perhaps LNDD develop a test for chicken. Will Walsh come out with a new book, detailing Lance’s use of chicken. Did Floyd eat a chicken sandwich on that fateful day? Inquiring minds want to know.

Morgan Hunter February 13, 2008 at 9:57 am

What about the Duck! Will they develope a “duck test too?” A theoretical question – if the chicken test works – will it be able to measure “1000 year old” eggs too? I can see it now – “jerked chicken a la roid.” EPO “chicken fricassee! Washed down with good old fashioned Tsing-Tao Beer! Yum!

Art February 13, 2008 at 10:27 am

The article also mentions that atheletes are encouraged to sample the local fare once their competition is over. But wouldn’t that be a foolish risk of failing an out of competition test?

Art February 13, 2008 at 10:28 am

BTW, I take Norvasc for BP. It is a calcium channel blocker. It doesn’t seem to make me faster, FWIW.

Morgan Hunter February 13, 2008 at 10:53 am

Stay away from the Kung-pao Chicken!

Morgan Hunter February 13, 2008 at 10:57 am

Hey Rant – did you know that you have Google running this add on your site?

Hardcore Sports Chemicals
Anapolon DNP Primobolan Deca Fat Loss Anavar Ganabol Winny
http://www.europeandispensary.com

Isn’t that “special.” I believe some of that stuff are “precursors” I LOVE TRUTH IN ADVERTISEMENT!

Morgan Hunter February 13, 2008 at 10:58 am

Rant – I love this one even better!

Bulk Up Add 10 Lbs Mass
Factory Direct Human Growth Hormone
HgH.com

Michael February 13, 2008 at 11:06 am

Art, the new drug is not a channel blocker. The new drug is very similar in that it blocks the calcium from leaking out of the calcium channel. However these new drugs will allow the calcium channel to continue to operate (rather that blocking it) normally, while a channel blocker stops the channel from operating normally.

Rant, the big question, before we go crazy, is an anti-fatigue drug performance enhancing? As far as I can decifer, the rycal drugs prevent heart arrhythmias by staving off the fatigue mechanism, which is obviously performance enhancing to the person with the heart failure. . .But I doubt that the theory lives up in reality. On the surface it looks like the drugs probably would help as long as they don’t have any negative or obvious side effects.

For example, riders who use artificial blood (hemopure or polyheme), will develop jaundice due to the infusion of free hemoglobin, in addition to other obvious side effect. Rasmussen was believed to have led the TDF while using this stuff, but hemoglobin solutions will make a rider’s blood specimens appear hemolyzed (the red blood cells will break down), which would be easily spotted in any blood test. Even by LNDD testing methodology. (so it seems unlikely that he was using these products at that time – not to absolve him of wrong doing) But the point is, numerous medications are developed for catastrophic health problems, where the side effects may be severe, but not as bad as the indications for prescription.

BTW, Isn’t it ironic that you give a chicken growth hormone and it becomes freakishly large, but you take growth hormone and your chicken gets small?

Rant February 13, 2008 at 11:06 am

Art,
Good point about the out-of-competition tests. Not a risk worth taking. And interesting about the calcium channel blocker. I suspect that won’t stop WADA from banning the use of those drugs, however.

snake February 13, 2008 at 5:35 pm

“… Dr. Marks’s group analyzed them without knowing which samples were from the exercisers and which were not.”

Imagine that. A *blind*. LNDD ? Hello ?

snake February 13, 2008 at 6:06 pm

i don’t see these ads that morg refers to.

is there another way into the daily rants ? i use “rant-your-head-off.com”.

oh heck, like i need 10 lbs of added “mass” anyways.

Rant February 13, 2008 at 7:04 pm

Snake,

I have Google Ads running in the right-hand column. Google serves up the various ads, so I don’t always know what they contain. Every time the site is accessed, a new ad can appear. Sometimes they’re political, sometimes for cycling stuff, sometimes I have no idea where they connected this site to what they’re pitching. I earn so little from them that I have yet to get paid (you have to earn $100 in ad revenue before a check hits your mailbox). But what the heck. Someday, I may get a check from them.

Anyway, whenever I see ads for steroids or performance enhancing drugs, I add them to my list of blocked advertisers. The ones Morgan pointed out are soon to be on the list.

Morgan,

Thanks for the tips. They will be blocked in the near future (as soon as it takes for my updates to kick in…)

BSMB February 13, 2008 at 7:57 pm

I am so pleased that le tour is kicking Astana out for the 2008 edition. FINALLY the shit hits the team and managers and owners and money people as well as the riders. For ever the team management has condoned and encouraged the riders to dope to WIN, WIN at any cost. This is great news for the whole of the cycling community and may FINALLY get the attention of team management groups to run these teams under ethical and legal standards.

Rant February 13, 2008 at 8:33 pm

BSMB,
If that’s what all this is about, no issues here. But what about other teams with doping scandals last year? Cofidis? High Road? Rabobank? Shouldn’t they all be given the boot, too? What’s good for the goose, as they say …

Morgan Hunter February 13, 2008 at 10:14 pm

snake,

I’m in Europe – so like CNN – we get something different at times from what plays back in the States.

May I recommend the “Chinese Chicken Salad?” – Of course – you will have to go to mainland China…but heck – If a man needs 10lbs of more 2lean” then part of the fun is the getting there, no?

Rant,

It’s all about “appearances” ain’t it? That is if you have no “real parameters” (think rules here) – to work with – then you can portray any image that suits you. And let us not forget the Golden Rule – He who has the gold rules.

snake February 14, 2008 at 12:19 am

it was my ad blocker. now i can see what you’ve been talking about. my ad says FORTY pounds of guaranteed lean muscle. there’s a load of chicken salad for you.

well rant, at least you have some control over who can advertise on your site. that’s decent of them.

BannaOj February 14, 2008 at 12:54 pm

All I can say is that this catering story gives new meaning to the term “Roostered Up”

Previous post:

Next post: