A Beer Summit for Tour de France Champions?

by Rant on July 31, 2009 · 14 comments

in Alberto Contador, Lance Armstrong

Before I get started tonight, I’ll just mention that there are a couple of doping stories I’m going to be writing about, but the whole Lance vs. Alberto dustup got me to thinking (which is a dangerous thing).

There’s been lots of media coverage of a certain “beer summit” held at the White House yesterday, with Henry Louis (“Skip”) Gates, Jr. and Sgt. James Crowley in attendance. The beer summit was the President’s effort at creating a “teachable moment” (whatever the heck that means) out of the whole contretemps over Gates’ arrest for disorderly conduct —  in his own home.

Now, having done a bit more reading (original article here), it appears to me that on both sides of the Lance/Alberto chasm there are some frustrations, hurt feelings and perhaps even anger. One article that I saw, partially translated from Spanish by a gentleman named Jon Holmes, said (in part):

A Tale of solitude. It happened on Thursday, a few hours before the Annecy ITT. Contador came downstairs to the entrance of the Palace of Menthon, the luxurious Astana hotel. The Tour was on. He looked right, then left. Nobody, nothing. No Astana cars or helpers. Cold sweat. Quick time check. Where are they? The hotel is several kilometers from the start. There he was, the leader of the Tour, in flip-flops, bag in hand and alone. He went to the hall looking for an answer: Armstrong had ordered the helpers to go pick up his wife, kids and friends to the airport.

Contador left his room last because he was the last one starting the ITT. Armstrong had managed to take away his means of transportation. The straw that broke the camel’s back. Hot flashes, he was rabid. He called his brother Fran. He came to pick him up by car and took him to Annecy in a private vehicle. He left last and finished first. His best victory. In the ITT. In solitude. The same way he has won his second tour.

[…]

Contador’s toughest climb was not recorded in images. It was narrated by others. It was fought in the hotel and the bus: during one stage, Armstrong sat his guests at the very back of the bus, right in Contador’s usual seat. One more provocation. Armstrong to the luxury suite. Contador to sleep with Paulinho, the only ally. Same deal during the entire tour. Mouth shut, listening to Armstrong’s jabs: “It doesn’t take a Nobel price to figure out what happens with side winds”. Contador didn’t reply in the hotel. He did on the road. He attacked in the first mountain finish in Arcalis. Without permission from Bruyneel, Armstrong’s DS. That night the Astana hotel was a funeral. Red eyes from the Texan (anger? crying? not sure). The first cyclist that stood up to him. And he did it in silence.

And, of course, there were the frustrations on the other side about not following Bruyneel’s strategy. Who got upset first in all of this? Contador when he first found out about Armstrong joining the team? Armstrong when he heard about Contador’s “mistake” in Paris-Nice? Contador after hearing Armstrong’s comments about what happened in Paris-Nice? How far back does this go? The whole saga strikes me as a chicken/egg kind of thing. Which came first? Who knows?

It does seem that Contador has reason to be frustrated with Armstrong and what happened, especially on the day of the Annecy time trial. Was it something Armstrong did on purpose? Was it a misunderstanding? We don’t know, exactly. Could be either one. There’s a whole range of possible explanations/excuses/justifications. I’m not even going to try and write them all down. However it happened, it was not a very nice thing to leave Contador stranded and having to call for a ride to the start.

Whatever has happened over the last year, it doesn’t seem to me that the war of words does either one any good. Well, maybe if Armstrong and Contador want to focus on each other and the perceived slights/insults/misunderstandings as a way of motivating their training for the next year, it might do some good — for them.

But I have this idea for settling disputes between former winners of the Tour, and it goes something like this:

For cyclists, the best place to settle an argument is on the road, or on the trail. So rather than engage in this tit-for-tat stuff in the media, let’s put the animosity to good use — and maybe even build a few bridges and a bit of understanding (I’ll bitch-slap the first person who starts singing “Kumbaya”, by the way).

So, let’s have a challenge between Tour de France champions with a grievance. I’m thinking of a trail in the Rocky Mountains, not far from Lance’s Aspen lair, which is a bit on the technical side and finishes just a bit below 14,000 feet. Good climbing on the way up, and a pretty wickedly fast descent. It’s off road, so mountain bikes will be the order of the day. Perhaps we can convince a certain Waterloo, Wisconsin-based manufacturer to provide the two-wheeled wonder bikes for the occasion.

The ride would be to raise money for charity, and each rider would get to name his charity. Fans could donate through a web site. The way the race would work is this: Fastest man to the top wins Stage 1, the ascent. Fastest man down from the top wins Stage 2. To settle matters once and for all, a third time-trial stage would be conducted on a different trail, which is a 30-some mile loop. There could even be a few real world participants, those who don’t race bikes for a living (though perhaps they race as amateurs). Points are awarded for the top finishers in each stage. At the end of the competition, the person with the most points is the winner.

So, what prizes would the participants get? Top prize would be a case of beer from a local brewpub. The one with labels designed by Ralph Steadman. Or perhaps another one. We’ll see. The other finishers would receive similar prizes, though the quantity might be less. Maybe the guy in 10th would wind up with a single beer. I haven’t figured this all out yet.

So, who would I invite to the Beer Summit for Tour de France Champions? Well, here’s the list I came up with earlier today:

  • Lance and Alberto — for obvious reasons
  • Carlos Sastre and Bjarne Riis — Riis didn’t renew his contract with Sastre after the Spaniard won last year’s Tour, and Sastre was pretty miffed about how the media covered him this year. Alberto and Lance who?
  • Michael Rasmussen and Theo de Rooij — OK, Rasmussen didn’t win the Tour, but he could have if de Rooij and Rabobank hadn’t pushed him out of the race in 2007
  • Floyd Landis and Oscar Peirero — All too well documented on this site and others. Pereiro whined about how he didn’t get to enjoy being the Tour winner because of, well, let’s not get into it, shall we?
  • Pat McQuaid — because it would be fun to see him suffer on a bike (I know, I’m a sick puppy)
  • Dick Pound — to see whether he can actually ride a bike
  • Greg LeMond — in a category by himself, due to the feuds he’s had with both Landis and Armstrong (although, because of a certain lawsuit, LeMond might have to be provided a bike from a different manufacturer)
  • Frankie Andreu — Why Frankie? Because of a certain other feud. Despite all of that, I can tell you first hand, he’s a nice guy and a very strong rider
  • Bob Roll — who raced le Tour Day France back in the day, and who also raced mountain bikes and used to write some wickedly entertaining articles in various publications before he got the Versus gig
  • Levi Leipheimer and Andréas Klöden — two riders who in my opinion should have won the Tour, but haven’t
  • Johan Bruyneel — who will have to actually ride a bike and not plot strategy
  • Phil Liggett and Paul Sherwen — not to ride — unless they want to — but to provide color commentary for the Versus coverage we’re bound to get
  • Oh, and since this is my daydream, I’d get to ride this, too, so that I could write about the whole experience for this blog, and perhaps a real, honest-to-goodness cycling publication somewhere. (My charity would be the pancreatic cancer program at the Johns Hopkins Medical School/Hospital.)

At the end of the event, which would take place over two days, there would be a barbecue at a certain person’s house. Everyone would sit around a bonfire and share their frustrations. Somewhere along the way, in the spirit of friendship and good will, Alberto would express his undying admiration for Sheryl Crow, while Lance would speak of his love for music by the Buena Vista Social Club. We’d all grab some guitars, and at the end of the evening — after a lot of coaching — we’d join in a rousing chorus of … no! not “Kumbaya,” dammit! … but “The Low-Down No Good Down Home Road Rash Blues.” (Which is guaranteed to bring a smile to even the sourest of faces.)

I know, fat chance it’ll happen. But a guy can dream, can’t he?

strbuk August 1, 2009 at 8:08 am

Hey I’d pay to see it!! But I want Dick Pound and Patty McQuaid in on the Landis/Pereiro stage, it only seems right!!! As for the ACvsLA contro, who knows what really happened? Translations are sketchy at best, wrongs were likely committed on both sides, and I STILL want to see how AC rides without JB as DS. Actually with the crap they pulled during the TdF Garmin seems like an apt team for AC (apologies to fans of his, but he seems like a whiner)

str

Rant August 1, 2009 at 8:36 am

I agree, wrongs may well have been committed on both sides of the Contador/Armstrong divide. It will be very interesting to see how well AC does on a team with a different directeur sportif.
In my vision, the invitees would all compete on the same stages, the same days. Maybe we should have McQuaid and Pound signed up to ride a tandem mountain bike? That would be something I’d definitely pay to see! 😉

Theresa August 1, 2009 at 10:09 am

I love it, Rant!!! I’m interested to see how AC does with another DS too. The hotel story sounds like maybe the “favorite” mode of transportation was gone. I can’t believe Astana didn’t have another car or a taxi for AC. But I can believe that LA sent the “limousine” or the bus to pick-up the family. And AC did NOT want to go by taxi….
And you are right on with Levi and Klodi!!!

And Paula, I’m a Garmin fan, because of my favorite riders. But JV needs lots of explaining to do if he signs AC!!!!

Elizabeth August 1, 2009 at 10:48 am

http://www.velocitynation.com

English translation of El Pais article. How appropriate that one of the banners on the site is Haterade and Hater tots?

Ken S August 1, 2009 at 11:37 am

Rant, your summit is an interesting idea to dream about. Of course, for it to really work the contestants would need to actually want to build bridges and not just make it a photo op. Though the races would be a good way to settle disputes. I think we may see some of that next July. ( As for a ‘teachable moment,’ I think it means a chance for a photo op and an opportunity to help people forget that Obama spoke up wrongly about something even after he admitted he didn’t have the facts.)

As for the AC / LA thing, it’s all getting ridiculous. It’s all hearsay and second hand. Seems that both have not been the best of professionals since the beginning. I think that was pretty much what most expected when Lance’s return was announced. Two personalities that were going to clash with no one really buying statements of, “I’ll work for him if he’s the strongest.”

It’s all starting to seem like a couple of spoiled kids now. Seriously? I’m supposed to feel sorry for Contador because someone was in his seat? What is he, 5? Did he ask them to move, or cry?

Maybe you can give the winners of each race a pacifier when they’re on the podium.

Rant August 1, 2009 at 1:21 pm

Theresa,
Thanks.
Elizabeth,
Thanks for posting the link. I was hoping someone knew where a good translation of the El Pais article was. Most appreciated.
Ken,
It is just a daydream. I rather doubt the main players could be talked into it. But you never know … 😉 The whole thing is getting a bit ridiculous, to be sure. I keep hearing the voice of Rodney King in the background saying, “People, can’t we all just … get along?” The pacifier idea gave me a good laugh, by the way. Maybe that will be the winner’s trophy — if the event ever gets off the ground.

Rickie Rainwater August 2, 2009 at 4:06 am

You obviously have a great deal of time on your hands and think way too much.

Rant August 2, 2009 at 7:09 am

Hmm. Mr. Think-to-much. Has an almost Monty-Python-esque ring to it, don’t you think? 😉

William Schart August 2, 2009 at 2:09 pm

This, to me, is rather a tabloid type of thing. While we certainly would like our heros to be model citizens, it is often the case that they are otherwise. Been going on for quite a while: Ty Cobb was a real alpha hotel, by all accounts.

Lance has always been pretty type A personality, driven to succeed. I suspect that many top level competitors are so. They’re the ones who are going to put in those extra miles, take extra swings in BP, hit the weights a little bit harder, etc., when training; and they’re the ones who are going to dig deep when the chips are down in a game or race for that extra bit of effort to hang on up the big climb, get that key hit or out, pick up a first down or whatever.

So if LA and AC are verbally sparring, so what? More troubling, perhaps, is the incident re transport at the ITT. But so far we’ve only heard one side. What really happened and why? Not that I am necessarily suggesting that AC has made this all up, I don’t know. Maybe LA thought there was enough time for the car to pick up his family and get back for AC or maybe he thought there was other transport available. Or maybe he did do it to mess with AC.

But hey, why the need for a beer summit. Let’s let this feud go on. Next July, there will be a lot of people following the Tour to see AC put that jerk LA in his place, and a lot of other people who will be looking for LA to shut that crybaby up. And a lot of others looking for the Schlecks to put both of them in their place.

Rant August 2, 2009 at 2:52 pm

You know, William, if this feud goes on, you’re right. Next July (and possibly sooner), the racing will be very interesting, indeed. One thing that gets the fans interest is a good rivalry or feud.
There goes the trip to Aspen, I’m afraid. And here I was thinking I could find a way of traveling out there and getting a write-off for it — and a Hunter Thompson-esque story out of the trip, too. Easy come, easy go. 😉

Ken S August 2, 2009 at 7:00 pm

William, your last paragraph reminded me of way back when, when I was waiting in line for the doors to open at Bogarts. Guy behind me wasn’t sure who Allan Holdsworth was and thought he should carry in Ronnie Montrose’s guitar. And of course the guy in front of me thought Ronnie should carry in Allan’s guitar. Everybody has their favorites. I, incidentally was glad to be able to see them both and remember Chad Wackerman’s solo as one of the highlights of the evening.

Anyway, more on topic, the transport incident is a little odd to me. It doesn’t make complete sense. If a car was left to take AC, wouldn’t the driver have known that? And wouldn’t he have told Lance he had to take Alberto to the ITT? Sounds more like it would have been a simple mix-up to me than a plot against Alberto. But we don’t really know enough of what happened, just one side of things. Which just might be a little biased.

William Schart August 3, 2009 at 7:21 pm

Ken:

I kind of wondered about transportation arrangements myself. Seems to me things would be more organized than AC’s story seems to imply. But then what do I know about the inner workings of a pro cycling team?

I just recalled the incident in 1989 when Delgado showed up late for the Prologue TT. I don’t recall, nor does Wikipedia say what the reason/excuse was for this.

Rant August 3, 2009 at 7:52 pm

Ken,
There does seem to be something missing to the story about the transport incident. It could have been a simple mix-up, as you say, rather than an attempt at messing with Contador. What we’ve got right now, as you pointed out, is just one side of the story.
William,
Too bad I don’t have my copy of VeloNews from way back then, but it’s long since been recycled. There was someone else who showed up late for his prologue start, back in 2006. For that rider, it was a last-minute wheel change that got him to the start house late, I believe. Other than Delgado showing up late, I don’t remember why it happened for him.

Jean C August 4, 2009 at 2:33 pm

William,

Delgado was late at the start : he was with a mecano preparing his bike. Attending his bike, he went in the next street to train and come back too late, he was sure to be in time by showing Kelly. It was a mistake, he discovered he was late just when he was very close of the start slope.

Previous post:

Next post: