… or thereabouts. Right now, my book Dope: A History of Performance Enhancement in Sports from the Nineteenth Century to Today is scheduled to be released at the end of June. It’s being published by Praeger, which is an imprint of the Greenwood Publishing Group. (Greenwood’s catalog description here.) If all goes according to plan, you should be able to get a copy shortly before the 2008 Tour de France begins.
For most of 2007, my second job (third, if you count this blog) was writing a history (not “the” history, as that could fill an encyclopedia — and perhaps there ought to be one called the Encyclopaedia Dopaica) of performance enhancement in the sporting world over the last century plus.
Dope starts in the mid-1800s, when doping was performed on racehorses with the intent of altering the natural outcome of races. Back then, the stables in which the horses were kept weren’t all that well guarded, so a doper could come along and administer a drug that would affect the animal’s racing. Sometimes the drugs were meant to give the horse a boost, and sometimes they were meant to slow the animal down.
There are, of course, stories of doping within cycling that go back quite a way. Some of the characters you’ll meet in the book include cyclinst Arthur Linton and Jimmy Michael, along with their manager, Choppy Warburton. Warburton, incidentally, is likely the first manager ever banned for doping his athletes.
You’ll get to see stories of doping in the Olympics from the quadrennial spectacle’s earliest days, the rise of various drugs (like amphetamines, testosterone, other steroids and eventually EPO and designer steroids), as well as read about doping incidents across a wide range of sports over the last century. You’ll read stories of doping in weightlifting, swimming, track and field, cycling, football (both kinds), baseball, as well as doping in other sports.
While the attention that is currently paid to the subject makes it often appear as if the problem is of relatively recent vintage, you’ll learn about a scandal in the 1950s that rocked the world of track and field in much the same way as the Festina scandal and other scandals have rocked cycling over the past 10 years. At the center of the story was a doctor who claimed that many of the athletes who broke the four-minute mile mark in the 1950s did so through the use of amphetamines. His character and behavior are eerily reminiscent of other, more recent figures. An interesting outgrowth of that scandal: One of the first scientific studies aimed at determining the real benefit of a performance-enhancing drug.
But most of all, what I hope you’ll get out of the book is an appreciation and understanding that doping is not a problem that just magically appeared over the last twenty years (despite how the many in the mainstream media seem to cast the story). The desire to boost human performance, and to find ways of pushing the boundaries of what we’re capable of, has existed for a very, very long time. And at one point in time, “the human experiments” that doping athletes perform were once even considered merely using technology in man’s quest to be better, faster and stronger. The perfectability of man/woman, if you will.
Dope should give readers a good understanding of the history of doping in sports, and how doping has grown to be the problem that it is today.
A bit about the history of the project: Dope came about as a lucky accident (at least, on my part). The editor I’ve been working with at Praeger/Greenwood approached me about the possibility of doing a project like this in September 2006, not long after Rant Your Head Off came into existence. Without this blog, and the fact that she was (and remains) a regular reader, Dope would never have come to be. Also, the support, encouragement and editorial input from my wife made the overall project much easier to get through and undoubtedly made the book vastly better. Before my editor ever read a word, my wife read over each chapter with a fine-toothed comb.
Quite a few people helped me in the research for the book, or by taking time out of their busy schedules to answer some of my questions. And a number of regular commenters here gave good suggestions for stories to include in several of the chapters. Other comments and suggestions helped shape how the book was written and put together. You’ll get a full listing of the guilty parties in the foreword. Hopefully, I didn’t leave anyone’s name out. If I did, I’ll make a note of it on this site before the book comes out. I’m grateful to all who helped me in my year-long quest.
Once the book is out in print, you’ll be able to download an Afterword from this site. Given the fast pace of stories, the Afterword will fill in some of the major stories that have occurred since I had to submit my finished manuscript. (Who knows, perhaps the CAS decision in Floyd Landis’ case will even be out by then.)
It was quite the ambitious project to try and write a book of this sort in my spare time. The journey is rapidly coming to an end. For me, the last bit to get done is the index. I’ve got three weeks to complete it. After that, all that will be left will be finishing the Afterword. Over time, the Afterword may get updated. If/when that happens, you’ll be able to get the latest version here, too.
Click the link in the right-hand column, or the link at the top of this article, to pre-order your copy today. Be the first kid on your block to own a copy of Dope.
Hey Rant – CONGRATULATIONS!!!!
Wishing you great success with —“Dope: A History of Performance Enhancement in Sports from the Nineteenth Century to Today” – (:-))
Is there any possibility that it will be into other languages?
I’d lay money on it – your Papa would be proud.
PS –
Mrs Rant – Would not forget you. Therefore you deserve a separate mention all to yourself. How I envy Mr Rant……..really…..I do…..I asked my wife to “proof read” my scribblings….I did……but sadly she’s Austrian, need I say more? (TIC)
Congratulations Rant,
Looking forward to the read.
Congrats Rant,
I’m stoked to read it.
Congrats Rant!:)
I’m looking forward reading your book!
Rant,
Interesting photo on the cover. Was there a lot of debate about what to put on the cover? You’ve mentioned that it is about doping in sport in general but i would be interested to know why that picture was chosen? Sometimes,as we know doping does not allways produce a sportsman of Herculean proportions, ie EPO. I think the general public has the opinion that dopers are always bulked up but this is certainly not allways the case. Would an ectomorph body type a la Rasmussen have conveyed the same meaning or would this have just created confusion?
oops, was cut off there.
Last sentence. I think the general public may associate dopers with bulk but i wonder if it would have conveyed the same message if you had chosen an ectomorph body type a la Rasmussen or would it have been a marketing mistake?
Congratularions Rant
I don’t “know” you for very long, but I am sure it will be a great read! 🙂
Luc,
I’m not sure what (or if) there was any debate over cover art at the publisher. I think the picture plays into the popular conception of doping, and what the drugs do. In terms of the popular imagination, I suspect many (at least on this side of the pond) think of weightlifters when they think of doping. Or, at least that would have been the case before all the scandals in cycling. Even stories about baseball players who’ve doped make references to bulking up, and so on. But, there are many forms of doping, and not all of them involve changing one’s outward appearance. Illustrating such a broad topic is a bit tricky.
Everyone,
Thanks. I hope you all enjoy the book a great deal. It’s been an interesting trip, writing about doping in contexts other than cycling.
Rant:
How do you find time to do all this? Write and publish a book, keep a busy blog, your day job etc.
Congrats.
William,
Thanks. Honestly, I have no clue how I do all of this. 😉
Congratulations!!! Looking forward to reading your book!
Hey Rant, best wishes and good luck with the book. Well done!! I am really looking forward to reading it! Any chance you’ll sign my copy? 🙂
str
Rant, congratulations! `Your book is much needed. As you wrote above, the history of doping in sport goes back a long way. About the only thing that’s new is the shifting public attitude towards doping.
From your blurb, your book seems to focus on the performance-enhancing aspects of doping. Maybe it’s one and the same thing, but doping also seems to be about controlling and masking pain, and maintaining focus during the course of a long event (or season).
The roots of professional cycling are, in many cases, not very pretty. The original formula of the “six day races”, at least in the U.S., was about seeing who could ride the greatest distance over the six days, without scheduled rest periods. My understanding is that the original French road races were the same — to see who could complete a predetermined circuit first, again without a scheduled break. The task at hand was not just athleticism and cycling skill — it was also about sleep deprivation and the ability of the body to endure the strain of riding on an almost nonstop basis. Of course doping entered the scene at the outset — how else to stay up all night and endure the pain?
I fear that we’re stuck with some of this legacy even today.
Larry,
You forgot one other aspect of doping – it is to fix the race. I think today, meaning from the very beginning – doping was about fixing the outcome – because that is where the largest betting money is made…really no different then what goes on in greyhound racing or horse racing to name two that come immediately to mind – of course – its not legal…
Way cool Rant. Glad you did this. I look forward to reading it.
Debby,
Thanks. Most appreciated.
strbuk,
Sure. We’ll figure out how to get that done for you.
Larry,
I’d say the book traces the history of when various techniques and drugs came into use, it’s not much into the nitty-gritty details of the biology behind how the drugs work, except where necessary. It’s more to trace the arc of the who, what, when, where, why — with a bit of the how, but not enough to be a how-to manual. One of the earliest suspected doping incidents in cycling involves what Morgan alludes to — race fixing. And in that particular instance, a manager who was getting vengeance on his own rider for daring to make arrangements to go off and compete somewhere else.
BSMB,
Thanks. I hope you’ll enjoy the book.
My congrats as well. I too am looking forward to the read. Please post any schedule you might have for book signings. I too would like an autographed copy to go along with my FL signed copy of “Positively False.”
On Amazon it says: “Dope features an afterword that addresses the final conclusion of the Floyd Landis doping case”
The *final* conclusion ?
And, where did you find that old photo of me for the cover ?
(I was young. I needed the money.)
Well, snake, it wasn’t easy, but the folks in the art department at Greenwood were able to dig your old photo out of some dusty shoeboxes somewhere in the attic. 🙂
The afterword hasn’t been written — yet. When that copy was written, the expectation was that the Landis case would be over by the time the book comes out. We’ll have to wait and see if that’s how things work out. If not, the afterword will get updated when the decision comes down. As far as “final” goes, it depends on whether the meaning of the word “final” is final. Or something like that. 😉
Rant,
Congratulations for your book.
I will wait to buy it until my english skills are better to be able to appreciate it to his great value.
I think “you” should have released that book before TDF because a lot of retired riders are coming out in a lot of books too. All of them are confessing their doping use. Even Armstrong seems to have written his own apologize.
Who will win that book races? Probably Armstrong who has ever been able to have the best underground aids!
Jean,
Thanks. Your English skills are just fine, by the way. I’m sure whenever you read it, you’ll be able to follow everything in there.
{ 1 trackback }